Okay, let me break it down for you.
That’s a VERY small percentage. And even then, it’s population control – we need murders, and human wars to control population. Better technology is not going to solve the issue of diminishing land and higher birth rates. Who cares if a few hundred thousand people die, it won’t matter at this point, because it’s a cycle, so the population gets renewed anyway.
However, if you kill off the people who have drugs, it’s an instant wipe-out. There is no constant reduction, and if you carry out the plan in steps, the drug dealers will always be one step ahead of you. Always.
NOPE! I disagree with your disagreement. Lessened demand = lessening supply = higher prices in order to make profit = no buyers which eventually equals no demand.[/quote]
How will that have lessened demand? By killing off drug dealers, you are only INCREASING demand for it, thus sky rocketing prices, kicking human greed into gear, creating more buyers who want to make a quick buck. Do you think that people won’t buy drugs just because they’re expensive? NO. People pay hundreds of thousands, and private funds from well-off people guarantees the success of the drug industry.
It just can’t be done, don’t think about any further, because it just can’t. No effort in the world will be enough, and you just won’t have support. Look at your class, I bet 90% of the people, at least, disagreed with that opinion. We had a debate on this in a business class, and only a friend and I were arguing from your perspective, the rest of the class wanted to kill us.
So no, just, no.