Reply To: PSATs

Home Forums General Chat PSATs Reply To: PSATs

#21009
David
Participant
tarheel91 said:

David said: If you show uncertainty towards a word that implies absoluteness, the absolute doesn’t take precedence over your uncertainty.

So what would be not an absolute? Like, I really don’t think that there’s a person on this site within that age range that can score 220+?

It won’t change anything.

By anyone, I meant any one. As in, any one person.

._.

Besides, it’s the truth. -____-;

Like, “The great majority of people on this site within that age range can’t score 220+.” Anyone is defined as an absolute, period. Something being absolute has nothing to do with certainty. It’s absolute in the sense that it remains constant for all scenarios (in this case, every single person at that age). The first time you wrote it you said something like (paraphrasing) “anyone at this site could get a 220+ at that age” which made me think you were saying none of us could have gotten that score at that age. Since I did do that, I was trying to imply that your absolute was wrong.

No, I knew that people could. I did that, you did that, Naz did that, AznRiceFan did that, people did that at that point in time, but I’m saying right now. The thread is for right now.

But currently, there isn’t anyone that could. I’m fairly sure of it. 220 is a hard score to achieve, maybe only 5% of the entire population gets that.

Anyway, Ganzicus, unless you can show otherwise, 220 means 70, 75, 75. I guess a 80 math would be okay, so 70, 70. That’s pretty hard, considering there’s only 5 sections.