- This topic has 8 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Arladerus said: My dad bought MW2. I was debating whether L4D2 is better.
I like both, although L4D2 impresses when you consider that the sequel which took 1 year is just as good (or better) than a sequel which took a longer time to develop. So, in a way, L4D2 wins. :3
It’s not about how long it took or how ownage they are at making a fast game; I heard Assassin’s Creed II has no repetative gameplay in terms of main storyline. That’s called ownage. If Duke Nukem Forever is awesome, who cares that they took 15 years?
Point and fact is, Duke Nukem sucks. Based on what’s out there, over the span of 13 years, they haven’t came up with anything.
Both L4D/MW4 franchises are based on multi-player, so if you only played single-player, you’re really off on the judgment, but overall, I think L4D2 is simply better because Zombies = ftw.
L4D2 IS AMAZING.
Okay, so Dead Center Finale is fricking hard, even on Advanced (out of Easy|Normal|Advanced|Expert)
There are a ton of Dedicated servers.
Achievements are real easy and make you feel like you’re good at the game.
MW2 has no dedicated servers and multiplayer gets annoying. Oh, and dislike the Smuckers Jam on my screen when I get hit.
Duke Nukem Forever didn’t even have anything to begin with, it was all a hoax.
Halo 3 has no dedicated servers and it’s perfectly fine. I don’t see the problem… why can’t people just host a game?
Arladerus said: Halo 3 has no dedicated servers and it’s perfectly fine. I don’t see the problem… why can’t people just host a game?1. Local Hosts give the host 5 ping and everyone else 5000.
2. Running a Local Dedicated requires a hellvula lot of resources, you need a complete computer committed to running it.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.