- This topic has 40 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Ohh shit move to gaming plz
Just played a good 2 hours of it.
One of the only remnants that God exists on this Earth.
WON’T DROP UNTIL HALF A YEAR LATER! RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE-
Wait, Rapage you said? O_o
Actually, from what I’ve heard, the campaign is a bit whack.
The multiplayer, however, has been polished to a nice golden sheen like the trophy in your cabinet.
If you bought MW2 for campaign, then you just wasted your money. It’s not about the single-digit hour campaign; it’s about the triple digit hour online.
It’s not about the triple-digit hours online; it’s all about the kill (or for the pessimists, death) streaks.
Nothing like a nuke to wake up those damn campers.
darkness said: It’s not about the triple-digit hours online; it’s all about the kill (or for the pessimists, death) streaks.Nothing like a nuke to wake up those damn campers.
I wanna see you get a nuke before the game ends xp
Some people’ve been calling MW2 ‘a-$40-box-of-cancer’, and my friend told me graphics and gameplay wise, MW1 was waay better. MW2 is just there for multiplayer.
Zhlink said: Some people’ve been calling MW2 ‘a-$40-box-of-cancer’, and my friend told me graphics and gameplay wise, MW1 was waay better. MW2 is just there for multiplayer.Graphics use the same engine. They can’t be worse. Other than that, when have either of these games ever been about anything besides multiplayer.
The campaign is too badass for it’s own good.
“Hey guys, let’s replicate the coolness nuke scene in MW1 like 10 trillion times”
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.