Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Lol, I’m joking.
Yes, the contest is still online. But, another winner will only be announced on December 15th.
Naw, he said everyone’s was original, but I guess that was kinda mean – but then again, everyone else was like, eum, no, you don’t deserve to win. :/ It doesn’t matter whether he deserves it or not, he won, that’s the point.
Move on people, Christ, it’s not that hard, and it’s not even your money. -_-
Remember that this is just a bonus, it’s Lockerz all over again.
All money from selling a e-book goes to this contest! 🙂 I don’t make anything anymore, my funds are gone.
And no, you cannot bash their submissions, because it’s just mean. :/
Also, I have decided that all future submissions will not be posted, and current submissions removed from public eyes.
Only the winning submission will be seen.
So, there we go.
Oh, and, btwz, you do know how much it costs to execute a guy in today’s world right? Litigation fees alone + court = over 20,000$ a case.
Yeah, GL.
That’s absolutely what I said in the first place, if you execute the BUYERS, you fuck the entire world up, everyone would be dead.
Plus, you do realize how easy it is to slip a pack of marijuana into someone’s jacket, call the cops on them, and get them executed the next day?
Yeah, good option, let’s just kill everyone on this planet, it’d be much easier than solving this problem. Heck, a few nukes would be more humane than arbitrary execution. Plus, what about human rights? Cops would need search warrants to actually bust people, so if people stay at home, doing drugs, they’re absolutely fine.
You’re not killing the root of the problem at all by killing the buyers, because simply, 1) there are too many, and 2) laws prevent this from happening, and 3) capital punishment is already banned in all of the eastern European countries, as well as many other developed countries, thus they won’t agree with this either. You’re not killing demand, because regardless of the abusers, medical institutions use drugs as beneficial aids for patients. You’re not killing demand, in fact, you’re not doing anything except killing a bunch of people for no reason – a person who has a bag of drugs in his pocket might be delivering it to his grandfather who’s sick. A few misunderstandings here, and that person would be dead under the institution that you propose.
The simple fact of the matter is that no, you cannot kill people for doing drugs, because drugs are beneficial. Drugs allow people to do whatever they want, and the only people that they hurt are of such tiny importance that it doesn’t have an overall effect on the natural progression of evolution, and, chances are, it won’t affect you. I agree however, that the government should abandon rehabilitation facilities for drug abusers, since the recovery rate is extraordinarily low.
Overall, there is no alternative – and killing off buyers does not stop the flow of drugs. There will always be new buyers as long as humans exist. Does the fact that there’s a death penalty stop murders from occurring? No, of course not. And it won’t work for this neither. From your ‘Utopian’ outlook, YEAH! It’ll work! But no, not in this world.
wtf, I was just trying to give a simple explanation.
We’re not particle physicists bro. :3 We’re not even close.
Okay, let me break it down for you.
Rep said: That would be the case if the drug only affected themselves. You think that the drug just makes people high and that’s it? Do you think that people just sit at home and light up? No, they’re outside. Methamphetamines are stimulants. Do you really think that users would just chill out like potheads? No, they’re outside. Robbing shit. Breaking shit. Hurting other people. And I’ll find some way to deal with those FAS babies soon. One problem at a time.That’s a VERY small percentage. And even then, it’s population control – we need murders, and human wars to control population. Better technology is not going to solve the issue of diminishing land and higher birth rates. Who cares if a few hundred thousand people die, it won’t matter at this point, because it’s a cycle, so the population gets renewed anyway.
However, if you kill off the people who have drugs, it’s an instant wipe-out. There is no constant reduction, and if you carry out the plan in steps, the drug dealers will always be one step ahead of you. Always.
NOPE! I disagree with your disagreement. Lessened demand = lessening supply = higher prices in order to make profit = no buyers which eventually equals no demand.[/quote]
How will that have lessened demand? By killing off drug dealers, you are only INCREASING demand for it, thus sky rocketing prices, kicking human greed into gear, creating more buyers who want to make a quick buck. Do you think that people won’t buy drugs just because they’re expensive? NO. People pay hundreds of thousands, and private funds from well-off people guarantees the success of the drug industry.
It just can’t be done, don’t think about any further, because it just can’t. No effort in the world will be enough, and you just won’t have support. Look at your class, I bet 90% of the people, at least, disagreed with that opinion. We had a debate on this in a business class, and only a friend and I were arguing from your perspective, the rest of the class wanted to kill us.
So no, just, no.
