Jil

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 606 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: My name is #16103
    Jil
    Participant
    David said: Scheme: A crap load of unecessary parenthesis.

    Java: A crap load of unnecessary classes

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #16090
    Jil
    Participant

    Comment Zappy’s CSS.

    /*
    world {color:green}
    */

    in reply to: Suggestion: Reply* to Fragments #16089
    Jil
    Participant

    Seriously. I love how many people are holding conversations over fragments when the PM system is actually much better suited for that. Well, unless you want to randomly have other people look at your conversation, which I can understand to an extent. But… it’s really not designed for that!

    Might as well just implement wall posts, really, and make fragments that are actually fragments post to the user’s own wall.

    To add onto the suggestion, though, as-is, PM ping notices could quote the fragment and then give the reply link, as well.

    in reply to: Free 10k NX. #16047
    Jil
    Participant

    Oh, so this is what David’s blog was about.

    You don’t make a thread about something and blog about the results, be consistent D:

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #16019
    Jil
    Participant

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #16011
    Jil
    Participant

    Sorts.

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #16009
    Jil
    Participant

    Robs.

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #16007
    Jil
    Participant

    Call through FF’s cell phone.

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #16004
    Jil
    Participant

    Force-feed a 100-meter ribbon.

    in reply to: I Swear, Kids are Getting Moar Perverted #15960
    Jil
    Participant

    Seen this weeks ago.

    Even the spam section on SP is ahead of the game.

    in reply to: I would ________ the person above me. #15959
    Jil
    Participant

    Yell at for forgetting her MSN pass.

    in reply to: Suggestion: Remove pagination on blogs #15779
    Jil
    Participant
    FunnyFroggy said: You’re just too damn lazy to click the next page! ADMIT IT! You just want to scroll down to read, ya lazy bastard!

    Exactly. But I prefer the term “efficiency” over “laziness”.

    Potatoes… -lesigh- Starch must be gettin’ in da veggies’ head. :/

    o_o

    in reply to: Suggestion: Remove pagination on blogs #15783
    Jil
    Participant

    There don’t have to be actual limits. People limit themselves.

    Rarely are there more than 20 comments that are actually relevant to the blog. After the 3rd or 4th page, in most cases, it just becomes aimless conversation. Which can be had anywhere.

    Besides, even if there are 300 comments on a blog, it won’t kill a browser to load all of them on one page. It might take a long time, sure, but those cases would be rare anyway.

    I think the browsing-efficiency gains for reasonable amounts of comments is worth it. 🙁

    Of note: A lot of legit blogging sites out there don’t have pagination on their comments at all. Empirical proof that they’re not a necessary feature.

    in reply to: Suggestion: Remove pagination on blogs #15814
    Jil
    Participant

    Oh, right. I read the PM, and typed half a response, then got distracted and did something else.

    Screw it I have homework to do D:

    in reply to: Suggestion: Remove pagination on blogs #15920
    Jil
    Participant
    Vusys said: It’s a bad idea, because blogs do get that long

    Then don’t make them that long. D:
    Elongated discussion is what forums are for.

    Edit: Oh, if it wasn’t clear enough, I’m referring to the pagination on blog comments. I think I was a bit ambiguous there.

    @Chameleon no rummaging required, it’s a sticky. But I care not ^^

Viewing 15 posts - 61 through 75 (of 606 total)